Internet Law etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
Internet Law etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

10 Mart 2012

MySpace, Inc. v. Graphon Corp.

MySpace, FOX, and Craigslist sought declaratory judgment that certain patents owned by GraphOn were invalid and not infringed by plaintiffs. The patents related to the ability to create, modify, and store database records over a computer network. The District Court granted plaintiffs summary judgment. The Federal Circuit affirmed. The district court's claim construction of "database" was reasonable and supported by the context; its overall conclusion that the claims were anticipated or obvious was appropriate. The case was properly decided under sections 102 and 103 of the Patent Act and not under section 101.


Kaynak: Justia

Digital-Vending Servs. Int'l, LLC v. Univ. of Phoenix

The patents are directed to regulating access to content that is delivered through a computer network. Digital-Vending sued three businesses involved in online education, alleging infringement. The district court issued a claim construction order. Two defendants entered into settlements. The third, University of Phoenix, sought summary judgment of non-infringement. Digital-Vending filed a motion for reconsideration of construction of the term "registered user." The district court granted for summary judgment of non-infringement and entered judgment in favor of Phoenix. The Federal Circuit vacated in part, finding that the determination was based on erroneous construction, and affirmed in part.


Digital-Vending Servs. Int'l, LLC v. Univ. of Phoenix, Inc. :: Federal Circuit :: US Courts of Appeals Cases :: US Federal Case Law :: US Case Law :: US Law :: Justia