Açık Radyo, FM 94.9, Bilgi Çağının Hukuku programı
Konu: Gelecegin teknolojileri ve hukuk, bulut bilisim, nanoteknoloji...
Konuk: Av. Vedat GURER
Yayin: 20 Temmuz 2012, 13.00-13.30
Muzik: Zaz, "La Fée" ("The Fairy"; "Peri")
Podcast: Açık Radyo
(Av. Vedat Gürer ile daha önceki bir programda da nanoteknoloji ve hukuk konusunda ilginç bir sohbet yapmıştık, bu konuyla ilgili bir makalesi ve o programın bağlantısı şurada!)
17 Temmuz 2012
13 Temmuz konuğu da TEVETOĞLU!
Acik Radyo FM 94.9 Bilgi Caginin Hukuku Programi
Konu: 1 Temmuz'da Yururluge Giren TTK ve BK ne getirdi?
Konuk: Yrd. Doc. Dr. Mete Tevetoglu
Yayin: 13 Temmuz 2012, 13.00-13.30
Muzik: Cihat Askin
Podcast: Açık Radyo
Konu: 1 Temmuz'da Yururluge Giren TTK ve BK ne getirdi?
Konuk: Yrd. Doc. Dr. Mete Tevetoglu
Yayin: 13 Temmuz 2012, 13.00-13.30
Muzik: Cihat Askin
Podcast: Açık Radyo
11 Temmuz 2012
Wikipedia Shuts Site to Protest Bill for Firewall in Russia - NYTimes.com
Wikipedia Shuts Site to Protest Bill for Firewall in Russia - NYTimes.com
MOSCOW — Major Internet sites and human rights advocates sharply criticized a proposed law that would grant the Russian government broad new powers to restrict Web content, ostensibly to protect children from pornography and other harmful material. Critics said the law could quickly lead to repression of speech and a restrictive firewall like the one in China.
Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia, shut its Russian Web site on Tuesday to protest the proposed measure, and instead posted a large warning on its home page: “Imagine a world without free knowledge.” The notice said the proposed law “can lead to the creation of extrajudicial censorship of the Internet inRussia, including the closure of access to Wikipedia.”
rest of the news: The New York Times 11.07.2012
MOSCOW — Major Internet sites and human rights advocates sharply criticized a proposed law that would grant the Russian government broad new powers to restrict Web content, ostensibly to protect children from pornography and other harmful material. Critics said the law could quickly lead to repression of speech and a restrictive firewall like the one in China.
Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia, shut its Russian Web site on Tuesday to protest the proposed measure, and instead posted a large warning on its home page: “Imagine a world without free knowledge.” The notice said the proposed law “can lead to the creation of extrajudicial censorship of the Internet inRussia, including the closure of access to Wikipedia.”
rest of the news: The New York Times 11.07.2012
7 Temmuz 2012
6 Temmuz 2012, Açık Radyo konuğu: METE TEVETOĞLU
Açık Radyo FM 94.9 Bilgi Çağının Hukuku Programı
Konu: 3. Yargı Paketinden Çıkanlar...
Konuk: Yrd. Doç. Dr. Mete Tevetoğlu
Yayın: 6 Temmuz 2012, 13.00-13.30
Müzik: Pavarotti, "O Sole Mio"
Podcast: Açık Radyo
Bu programda kesinleşen "3. Yargı Paketi" ya da tam başlığı ile; "Yargı Hizmetlerinin Etkinleştirilmesi Amacıyla Bazı Kanunlarda Değişiklik Yapılması ve Basın Yayın Yoluyla İşlenen Suçlara İlişkin Dava ve Cezaların Ertelenmesi Hakkında" -R.G. 28344 sayı, 5.07.2012 Tarih- 6352 sayılı Kanun'u konuştuk.
Tevetoğlu "paketten çıkanlar" konusunda güncel tartışmalara en çok konu olan;
- Danıştay ve idare mahkemelerinde açılan davalarda mahkemelerin yürütmenin savunmasını almadan yürütmeyi durdurma kararını veremeyeceğine,
- Ceza İnfaz Kanunu ve T. Ceza Kanununa getirilen değişiklikle üst sınırı 3 yılı aşan suçlamalar üzerine yapılan tutuklamalarda delillerin karartılması v.d. gerekçelerle tutuksuz yargılama yapılmasına karar verilemez iken bu sınırın kaldırılması üzerine artan tahliye taleplerine,
- Özel Yetkili Mahkemeler "kaldırılmış" ise de şu anda varolanların mahkemelerin ellerindeki davalara bakmaya devam etmek zorunda olduklarına,
- Aile içi şiddet suçları dahil icra takibi ve hacizlerde esasen devletin nakit akışı ile ilgili bir düzenleme yapıldığına, böylece İcra ve iflas dairelerine yapılacak her türlü nakdî ödemenin, Adalet Bakanlığı tarafından uygun görülecek bankalarda icra ve iflas dairesi adına açılan hesaba yapılacağına,
SOPA/PIPA: A Case Study in Networked Discourse and Activism | Personal Democracy Forum
SOPA/PIPA: A Case Study in Networked Discourse and Activism | Personal Democracy Forum
Yochai Benkler is the Berkman Professor of Entrepreneurial Legal Studies at Harvard, and faculty co-director of the Berkman Center for Internet and Society. His research focuses on the effects of net-based information production on our lives, minds, and laws.
Yochai Benkler is the Berkman Professor of Entrepreneurial Legal Studies at Harvard, and faculty co-director of the Berkman Center for Internet and Society. His research focuses on the effects of net-based information production on our lives, minds, and laws.
4 Temmuz 2012
YAZILIM ve OYUNLARIN İKİNCİ EL SATIŞI HK. AVRUPA ADALET DİVANI KARARI
An author of software cannot oppose the resale of his ‘used’ licences allowing the
use of his programs downloaded from the internet
The exclusive right of distribution of a copy of a computer program covered by such a licence is
exhausted on its first sale
Court of Justice of the European Union
PRESS RELEASE No 94/12
Luxembourg, 3 July 2012
Press and Information
Judgment in Case C-128/11
UsedSoft GmbH v Oracle International Corp.
curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2012-07/cp120094en.pdf
use of his programs downloaded from the internet
The exclusive right of distribution of a copy of a computer program covered by such a licence is
exhausted on its first sale
Court of Justice of the European Union
PRESS RELEASE No 94/12
Luxembourg, 3 July 2012
Press and Information
Judgment in Case C-128/11
UsedSoft GmbH v Oracle International Corp.
curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2012-07/cp120094en.pdf
3 Temmuz 2012
25 Haziran 2012
29 Haziran Cuma konuğu: Prof.Dr. ASLI TUNÇ
Acik Radyo FM 94.9 Bilgi Caginin Hukuku Programi
Konu: "Digital Activism"
Konuk: Asli TUNC, Prof. Dr., Bilgi Universitesi
Yayin: 29 Haziran 2012 13.00-13.30
Müzik: Bruce Springsteen, "We Take of Our Own"
Konu: "Digital Activism"
Konuk: Asli TUNC, Prof. Dr., Bilgi Universitesi
Yayin: 29 Haziran 2012 13.00-13.30
Müzik: Bruce Springsteen, "We Take of Our Own"
Podcast: Acik Radyo: http://archive.org/
Bu Cuma da konuğum gene Sayın Aslı Tunç... Esasen geçen haftaki "Clicktivism" programından sonra kayda aldığımız "Dijital Aktivizm" bu hafta yayına girecek... Aslı Tunç Bilgi Üniversitesi'nde bu konuda yüksek lisans dersi de veriyor... Bu programda bu konu ayrıntılarıyla ele alınıyor...
22 Haziran 2012
22 Haziran Cuma, Açık Radyo konuğu: Prof. Dr. Aslı TUNÇ
Açık Radyo FM 94.9 Bilgi Cağının Hukuku Programı
Konu: "Slacktivism" / "Clicktivism"
Konuk: Aslı TUNC, Prof. Dr., Bilgi Universitesi
Yayın: 22 Haziran 2012 13.00-13.30
Podcast: Açık Radyo
Bugün Prof.Dr. Aslı Tunç ile "Slacktivism" (tembel işi, pasif eylemcilik) ve "Clicktivism" (tıklama eylemciliği) konusunu konuştuk... Tunç, bu konuların önemini yadsımamakla birlikte gerçek eylemciliğin elektronik ortamda değil sokakta olabileceği görüşünde olduğunu belirtti. Bu olgulara yandaş ve kuşkucu yaklaşımları anlattı, bu arada "Stop Kony" kampanyasına da farklı açılardan göz atıldı... Bu bağlamda ABD'de akademik çalışmalarını sürdüren sosyolog Zeynep Tüfekçi'nin Technosociology.Org başlıklı blogundan bu konuyla ilgili olarak paylaştığı değerlendirmesine de değinildi...
Aslı Tunç Twitter adresi: @aslitunc
20 Haziran 2012
ÇOK ÖNEMLİ BİR KARAR! "ECJ validates limited filtering... on telecommunications operators" - Lexology
ECJ validates limited filtering obligations imposed on telecommunications operators - Lexology:
ECJ validates limited filtering obligations imposed on telecommunications operators
Article 15 of the E-Commerce Directive provides that Member States shall not impose a general obligation on telecommunications operators, caching or hosting service providers, to monitor the information which they transmit or store, nor a general obligation to actively seek facts or circumstances indicating illegal activity.
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) twice denied the possibility for a Belgian court to impose general filtering obligations on telecommunications operators for it would violate the prohibition set forth by Article 15 of the ECommerce Directive.
The ECJ had initially admitted that certain filtering duties may be imposed to a hosting service provider provided that such injunctions be efficient and proportionate. Interestingly, the ECJ had taken its decision on the basis of its advocate general's opinion according to which such injunctions are admissible to the extent the provider at stake would not, on its own initiative, prevent infringers from accessing its services. The ECJ however stated that "the measures required of the online service provider concerned cannot consist in an
active monitoring of all the data of each of its customers in order to prevent any future infringement of intellectual property rights via that provider's website".
The ECJ had the occasion to revisit this question in subsequent cases, which raised in substance the question of the extent of the obligations that may be imposed on telecommunications operators with respect to the filtering of non-public content protected by intellectual property rights and transiting through their services.
In Belgium, courts of first instance had ordered telecommunications operators to render impossible the exchange of electronic files including musical works through peer-to-peer exchange platforms. Prejudicial questions were submitted to the ECJ as to, among others, the lawfulness of such injunctions. Strangely enough, the Belgian lower court had considered that filtering software were not processing personal data with the consequence that no violation of privacy was to be feared from the use of such software. Even
more, Belgian courts had not considered whether such filtering and blocking software could violate the freedom of expression or the secret of correspondence invoked by telecommunications operators.
The ECJ ruled that general filtering obligations do not comply with the E-Commerce Directive where, as it was in the main case, they would: concern all communications transiting through the operators' services; apply to all their customers without distinction; pursue preventive purposes; be under the control of the operators; and be unlimited in time.
The motivation of the ECJ lies essentially on the balance to be found between the protection of intellectual property rights on one hand, and the fundamental rights and freedoms, including the protection of personal data, on the other. The ECJ notably underlined the freedom to receive and communicate information and the difficulty to presume the unlawful character of the transmission of protected content over the internet, particularly in light of the varying legal exceptions to author's rights in the EU Member States.
One must, however, question those decisions as to why neither local courts nor the ECJ have considered more seriously the lawful or unlawful character of the intervention of any telecommunications operator on the information transiting through its services.
As a matter of law, Article 5.1 of the European Directive 2002/58/CE of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communication sector (Directive on Privacy and Electronic Communications or ePrivacy Directive) obliges Member States to guarantee "the confidentiality of communications and the related traffic data by means of a public communications network and publicly
available internet communication services". Member States must, in particular, "prohibit listening, taping, storage or other kinds of interception or surveillance of communications and the related traffic data by persons other than users, without the consent of the user concerned, except when legally authorised to do so in accordance with Article 15(1)".
Article 15.1 of the same directive provides that Member States "may adopt legislative measures to restrict the scope of the rights and obligations provided for in", for example, Article 5 "when such restriction constitutes a necessary, appropriate and proportionate measure within a democratic society to safeguard national security (i.e. State security), defence, public security, and the prevention, investigation, detection and prosecution of
criminal offences or of unauthorised use of the electronic communication system"; and "[to] this end, Member States may, inter alia, adopt legislative measures providing for the retention of data for a limited period justified on the grounds laid down in this paragraph".
These provisions were implemented or already existed in one form or another in national legislations prohibiting the taping of telecommunications during their transmission.
Considering that the ePrivacy Directive imposes that restriction to the confidentiality of communications be regulated at the legislative level, one may ask why, in the absence of an express legal exemption, a more radical prohibition of the imposition of filtering techniques by a judicial or administrative authority was not even considered by the Belgian courts and the ECJ.
In his opinion, the European advocate general had, however, concluded that general filtering obligation not expressly provided by law would violate the European Chart of Fundamental Rights as well as the European Convention on Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms for such obligations were not, in that case, provided by a legislative text.
It is therefore likely that the aforementioned decisions of the ECJ do not spell the end but will be followed by a more in-depth analysis of the issue at stake, which might lead to a stricter enforcement of the ePrivacy Directive when it prohibits the interception of telecommunications outside situations expressly contemplated by the law.
ECJ validates limited filtering obligations imposed on telecommunications operators
Article 15 of the E-Commerce Directive provides that Member States shall not impose a general obligation on telecommunications operators, caching or hosting service providers, to monitor the information which they transmit or store, nor a general obligation to actively seek facts or circumstances indicating illegal activity.
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) twice denied the possibility for a Belgian court to impose general filtering obligations on telecommunications operators for it would violate the prohibition set forth by Article 15 of the ECommerce Directive.
The ECJ had initially admitted that certain filtering duties may be imposed to a hosting service provider provided that such injunctions be efficient and proportionate. Interestingly, the ECJ had taken its decision on the basis of its advocate general's opinion according to which such injunctions are admissible to the extent the provider at stake would not, on its own initiative, prevent infringers from accessing its services. The ECJ however stated that "the measures required of the online service provider concerned cannot consist in an
active monitoring of all the data of each of its customers in order to prevent any future infringement of intellectual property rights via that provider's website".
The ECJ had the occasion to revisit this question in subsequent cases, which raised in substance the question of the extent of the obligations that may be imposed on telecommunications operators with respect to the filtering of non-public content protected by intellectual property rights and transiting through their services.
In Belgium, courts of first instance had ordered telecommunications operators to render impossible the exchange of electronic files including musical works through peer-to-peer exchange platforms. Prejudicial questions were submitted to the ECJ as to, among others, the lawfulness of such injunctions. Strangely enough, the Belgian lower court had considered that filtering software were not processing personal data with the consequence that no violation of privacy was to be feared from the use of such software. Even
more, Belgian courts had not considered whether such filtering and blocking software could violate the freedom of expression or the secret of correspondence invoked by telecommunications operators.
The ECJ ruled that general filtering obligations do not comply with the E-Commerce Directive where, as it was in the main case, they would: concern all communications transiting through the operators' services; apply to all their customers without distinction; pursue preventive purposes; be under the control of the operators; and be unlimited in time.
The motivation of the ECJ lies essentially on the balance to be found between the protection of intellectual property rights on one hand, and the fundamental rights and freedoms, including the protection of personal data, on the other. The ECJ notably underlined the freedom to receive and communicate information and the difficulty to presume the unlawful character of the transmission of protected content over the internet, particularly in light of the varying legal exceptions to author's rights in the EU Member States.
One must, however, question those decisions as to why neither local courts nor the ECJ have considered more seriously the lawful or unlawful character of the intervention of any telecommunications operator on the information transiting through its services.
As a matter of law, Article 5.1 of the European Directive 2002/58/CE of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communication sector (Directive on Privacy and Electronic Communications or ePrivacy Directive) obliges Member States to guarantee "the confidentiality of communications and the related traffic data by means of a public communications network and publicly
available internet communication services". Member States must, in particular, "prohibit listening, taping, storage or other kinds of interception or surveillance of communications and the related traffic data by persons other than users, without the consent of the user concerned, except when legally authorised to do so in accordance with Article 15(1)".
Article 15.1 of the same directive provides that Member States "may adopt legislative measures to restrict the scope of the rights and obligations provided for in", for example, Article 5 "when such restriction constitutes a necessary, appropriate and proportionate measure within a democratic society to safeguard national security (i.e. State security), defence, public security, and the prevention, investigation, detection and prosecution of
criminal offences or of unauthorised use of the electronic communication system"; and "[to] this end, Member States may, inter alia, adopt legislative measures providing for the retention of data for a limited period justified on the grounds laid down in this paragraph".
These provisions were implemented or already existed in one form or another in national legislations prohibiting the taping of telecommunications during their transmission.
Considering that the ePrivacy Directive imposes that restriction to the confidentiality of communications be regulated at the legislative level, one may ask why, in the absence of an express legal exemption, a more radical prohibition of the imposition of filtering techniques by a judicial or administrative authority was not even considered by the Belgian courts and the ECJ.
In his opinion, the European advocate general had, however, concluded that general filtering obligation not expressly provided by law would violate the European Chart of Fundamental Rights as well as the European Convention on Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms for such obligations were not, in that case, provided by a legislative text.
It is therefore likely that the aforementioned decisions of the ECJ do not spell the end but will be followed by a more in-depth analysis of the issue at stake, which might lead to a stricter enforcement of the ePrivacy Directive when it prohibits the interception of telecommunications outside situations expressly contemplated by the law.
17 Haziran 2012
15 Haziran 2012
15 Haziran: METE TEVETOĞLU ile E.TİCARET YENİLİKLERİ
Açık Radyo FM 94.9 Bilgi Caginin Hukuku Programı
Yayın: 15 Haziran 2012, Cuma, 13.00-13.30
Konuk: Yrd. Doç. Dr. Mete TEVETOGLU
Konu: E.Ticaret yenilikleri
Yayını dinlemek için: Açık Radyo Podcast
(Programın FaceBook sayfası için tıklayınız!)
12 Haziran 2012
8 Haziran 2012
8 Haziran 2012: Acık Radyo Program Konuğu: Mete TEVETOGLU
Açık Radyo FM 94.9 Bilgi Cağının Hukuku Programı
Yayın: 8 Haziran 2012, Cuma, 13.00-13.30
Konuk: Yrd. Doç. Dr. Mete TEVETOGLU
Konu: Oyun Hukuku
Yayını dinlemek için: Açık Radyo BCH Podcast
Bugün Mete Tevetoğlu ile genel olarak "oyun hukuku", konunun Türkiye'deki yasal düzenlemeleri, oyunlar üzerindeki fikri mülkiyet meseleleri, Internet üzerinden oynanan oyunlarda rastlanan sorunlar, açılan kimi hukuk ve ceza davaları, yeni kurulan Türkiye Dijital Oyunlar Federasyonu (Tudof.Org) üzerine konuştuk...
Tevetoğlu konuyu şöyle özetledi: Oyunun kuralı; v a r d ı r !
(Bu da programın FaceBook Sayfası! )
31 Mayıs 2012
1 Haziran 2012 konuğu: Av. ALİ OSMAN ÖZDİLEK
1 Haziran Cuma, 13.00-13.30 Bilgi Çağının Hukuku programı:
Konuk: Av. Ali Osman Özdilek
Konu: THY sitesinden hareketle, web sitesi "hack" hadisesini hukuki açıdan değerlendirme, değişen e.ticaret ve hukuk...
Ara: Pentagram'dan "Anatolia"...
Yayın Kopyası: Açık Radyo Podcast-Bilgi Cagının Hukuku
Konuk: Av. Ali Osman Özdilek
Konu: THY sitesinden hareketle, web sitesi "hack" hadisesini hukuki açıdan değerlendirme, değişen e.ticaret ve hukuk...
Ara: Pentagram'dan "Anatolia"...
Yayın Kopyası: Açık Radyo Podcast-Bilgi Cagının Hukuku
VKONTAKTE NEDEN KAPATILMIŞ?
18 Mayıs tarihli Açık Radyo programımızın konuğu olup, Rusların FaceBook'u gibi çalışan VKontakte.ru sitesine yapılan topyekun erişim engellemesinin Türk turizmine neler kaybettirdiğini anlatan turizmci Nurdoğan Şengüler bu haberi az önce yollamış:
"VKontakte meğerse neden kapatılmış?"
Haber doğru ise siteye erişim, sitenin 513 üye sayfasında bulunan, Tarkan’ın “Adımı Kalbine Yaz” şarkısı yüzünden MÜYAP'ın istemi üzerine kapatılmış...
Bu da bugünkü Radikal'den
"VKontakte meğerse neden kapatılmış?"
Haber doğru ise siteye erişim, sitenin 513 üye sayfasında bulunan, Tarkan’ın “Adımı Kalbine Yaz” şarkısı yüzünden MÜYAP'ın istemi üzerine kapatılmış...
Bu da bugünkü Radikal'den
Facebook'un Rusça versiyonu olan 'vkontakte'nin Tarkan'la yaşadığı telif sorunu yüzünden Türkiye'de kapatılmasına Rus turistlerden tepki geldi.
27 Mayıs 2012
25 Mayıs 2012
25 Mayıs Cuma: Doç. Dr. KEREM ALTIPARMAK ile INTERNET OZGURLUGU
Bugün Açık Radyo'da Bilgi Çağının Hukuku programında Ankara Üniversitesi, Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi öğretim üyesi, İnsan Hakları Hukuku doktoru Kerem Altıparmak'a Ankara'ya bağlanıyoruz.
Konu: Internet Özgürlüğü, Erişim Engellemeleri, Filtreleme ve İnsan Hakları Hukuku
Yayın: 13.00-13.30
Podcast: Açık Radyo- BilgiCagininHukuku25Mayis2012
Konu: Internet Özgürlüğü, Erişim Engellemeleri, Filtreleme ve İnsan Hakları Hukuku
Yayın: 13.00-13.30
Podcast: Açık Radyo- BilgiCagininHukuku25Mayis2012
Kaydol:
Kayıtlar (Atom)
